New insights into bacterial substitute for sex
Bacteria don’t have sex as such, but they can mix their genetic material by pulling in DNA from dead bacterial cells and inserting these into their own genome. New research has found that this process — called recombination — is more complex than was first thought. The findings could help us understand why bacteria which cause serious diseases are able to evade vaccines and rapidly become drug-resistant.
Bacteria don’t have sex as such, but they can mix their genetic material by pulling in DNA from dead bacterial cells and inserting these into their own genome.New research led by Imperial College London has found that this process — called recombination — is more complex than was first thought. The findings, published today in PLoS Genetics, could help us understand why bacteria which cause serious diseases are able to evade vaccines and rapidly become drug-resistant.Dr Rafal Mostowy of Imperial College London’s School of Public Health explains: “During recombination, bacteria might incorporate new DNA which makes them resistant to treatments, or they may take on genes which change their surface structure, enabling them to evade vaccines. Although we’ve known for almost a century that recombination takes place, it’s only since DNA sequencing has become available that we have been able to determine how often this takes place and how significant the changes are.”Scientists from Imperial College London, Harvard School of Public Health and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute studied two ‘lineages’ of the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae (known as pneumococcus), one of which is resistant to drugs. Pneumococcusis one of the major causes of pneumonia, meningitis and septicaemia; the World Health Organisation estimates that 1.1 million children under the age of five die each year of pneumonia alone.Using DNA sequences of bacteria strains collected over 36 years, Dr Mostowy and his colleagues were able to reconstruct an evolutionary tree for two ‘lineages’, mapping when new DNA had been taken on board and how the bacteria had evolved as a result. Although recombination has always been thought of as a uniform process, the models showed two distinct types of recombination — dubbed micro and macro.In ‘micro-recombination’, the bacteria regularly incorporate small amounts of DNA that make little difference to their genome. Although ‘macro-recombination’ takes place less frequently, it involves the bacteria taking on large amounts of DNA which make a significant change to the genome. It is this second process which the scientists believe enables the bacteria to change their appearance to evade vaccines or potentially take on resistance to drug treatments.The scientists found that recombination took place frequently in the evolution of the more resistant lineage they studied, and less frequently in the less resistant lineage. However, it was clear from the sequencing data that both strains had undergone micro- and macro-recombination.”This is a major step forward in our understanding of how recombination can result in bacteria evading vaccines and acquiring resistance to antibiotics,” says Dr Mostowy. “Currently we have effective means of preventing and treating pneumococcal disease, but it’s not clear how bacteria will respond in the long term.”Dr Nick Croucher, joint first author on the study, from Imperial’s School of Public Health, adds “This work shows that pneumococci can undergo potentially clinically important changes very quickly. Fortunately, whole genome sequencing, the technology that made this discovery possible, also holds great promise as a means of monitoring the emergence of these mutants in the future..”Professor Christophe Fraser, also from the School of Public Health at Imperial and senior author of the study, says: “As well as being important for public health, recombination in bacteria is biologically fascinating; the evolutionary purpose of absorbing DNA from dead and possibly only loosely related bacteria is mysterious. …
For more info: New insights into bacterial substitute for sex